Vince Panaro ended as Big Brother season 27's runner up, losing to Ashley Hollis in a 6-1 jury vote at Sunday's finale. The 34-year-old West Hills resident received $75,000 for making the final two, but fell short of his ultimate aim. In a post-finale interview with Entertainment Weekly, Panaro discussed his gameplay approach, jury management errors, and emotional journey through the tournament.
Big Brother challenges competitors to strike a balance between social ties and smart gaming while navigating weekly eliminations. The winner is eventually decided by an expelled houseguest jury, thus relationship management is critical to success. Panaro's approach of making final two deals helped him advance far but created significant jury resentment.
Hollis won the final Head of Household competition on Big Brother and chose Panaro as her opponent, correctly calculating that his burned bridges made him beatable. Morgan Pope cast the sole vote for Panaro, while six jury members sided with Hollis. Despite the lopsided result, Panaro expressed acceptance of the outcome while acknowledging his strategic missteps. His reflections provide insight into how over-promising and under-delivering on alliances can prove fatal in the game's final stages.
How did Vinny react to not winning Big Brother 27?
Panaro described feeling "at peace" despite the disappointing jury vote. He emphasized fulfillment from achieving his decade-long dream of playing Big Brother and experiencing the full competition.
"I got to do it and I got the full experience, and that's what I was really hoping for," he explained.
While winning remained his ultimate goal, he acknowledged that poor jury management undermined his chances. The runner-up demonstrated growth from his in-house emotional reactions to defeats. He said gaining distance from the experience allowed him to view his journey with "fresh eyes" and appreciate his efforts.
"I did the best I could in that moment," Panaro reflected
He was mostly suggesting that he won't dwell on the loss despite his history of self-criticism during the season. Panaro anticipated a potentially split jury vote before the final questioning began. He recognized Hollis had cultivated strong friendships among evicted houseguests but remained uncertain about their gameplay perceptions.
"I only knew my own perception of my own game," he admitted.
This knowledge gap created uncertainty about jury sentiment. He specifically expected Lauren's vote based on their relationship. Her decision to support Hollis visibly disappointed him, though he understood his decision to nominate her after she didn't use the veto likely influenced her choice. The finalist struggled during the jury question-and-answer session, describing himself as an introvert who lacks public speaking skills. He felt he "stumbled quite a bit" while Hollis excelled as a natural communicator.
"She's such a good public speaker. I am not," he conceded.
Panaro sensed his chances diminishing during the questioning but refused to abandon hope. He focused energy on his final speech, hoping to explain his strategic efforts and earn jury respect. The experience of "getting grilled" confirmed his suspicions about inadequate jury management throughout the season.
Vinny’s reflections on his performance
Panaro acknowledged his approach of telling everyone what they wanted to hear worked for advancing but proved disastrous for winning. He operated in "extreme self-preservation mode," making promises simply to survive each eviction.
"I would say anything just to make sure that I make it past one more eviction," he admitted. .
He recognized this strategy's fundamental flaw: it advances players far but creates resentment that destroys winning chances. His experience validates the importance of balancing progress with jury management. Regarding his $75,000 prize, Panaro plans careful financial management while unemployed, potentially paying remaining school loans if possible.
Big Brother airs on ITV2 and streams on ITVX in the UK.